Podsumowanie

Wskaźnikiem procesu deterioracji zdrowia w związku z wykonywaną pracą jest zespół wypalenia zawodowego. Zgodnie z teorią Wymagania – Zasoby Pracy wypalenie zawodowe rozwija się w związku z pracą jako efekt nadmiernych wymagań stawianych w tym środowisku, które nie są równoważone adekwatnymi zasobami organizacyjnymi. Wypalenie może dotknąć pracowników w różnych sektorach, a jego występowanie zależy od specyfiki zawodu i równowagi między wymaganiami pracy a dostępnymi zasobami.

WHO definiuje wypalenie zawodowe jako syndrom wynikający z przewlekłego stresu w miejscu pracy, obejmujący uczucie wyczerpania lub utraty energii, zdystansowanie wobec pracy oraz poczucie nieskuteczności zawodowej. Jednak zgodnie z najnowszą wiedzą główne komponenty wypalenia to wyczerpanie, zdystansowanie wobec pracy i pogorszenie funkcjonowania poznawczego oraz emocjonalnego. Tym kluczowym objawom mogą towarzyszyć objawy wtórne, takie jak obniżony nastrój bądź niespecyficzne objawy dystresu.

Objawy wypalenia zawodowego dzielą wspólną wariancję z innymi deficytami zdrowia psychicznego, zwłaszcza z lękiem i depresją. Jednak nie można twierdzić, że są to zjawiska tożsame. Co więcej, badanie rozpowszechnienia wypalenia zawodowego wśród pracowników powinno włączać osoby poszukujące pomocy psychologicznej.

Wypalenie zawodowe wpływa na jakość życia zawodowego i dobrostan pracowników. W związku z tym oddziaływania prewencyjne ukierunkowane na wypalenie zawodowe stają się domeną doskonalenia organizacji, podczas gdy interwencje, leczenie psychoterapeutyczne i farmakologiczne skoncentrowane na problemach ze zdrowiem psychicznym są domeną specjalistów w dziedzinie medycyny.



Podziękowania:

Praca została wsparta przez Narodowe Centrum Nauki,

grant nr UMO- -2017/26/M/HS6/00451

ABSTRACT

Professional burnout – is treatment necessary?

Professional burnout syndrome is an indicator of a process of health deterioration related to work. According to the Job Demands-Resources Theory, professional burnout develops in the workplace as a result of excessive job demands that are not balanced by personal and organizational resources. Professional burnout can affect employees across various sectors and organizations. The World Health Organization defines burnout as a syndrome caused by chronic workplace stress that has not been successfully managed. It is characterized by feelings of energy depletion, increased mental distance from one’s job, and reduced professional efficacy. According to the latest research, the main components of burnout are exhaustion, distancing from work, and impaired cognitive and emotional functioning. These core symptoms may be accompanied by secondary symptoms, such as low mood or nonspecific signs of distress. Professional burnout shares common variance with other mental health problems, particularly anxiety and depression, yet they are not identical phenomena. Furthermore, research on the prevalence of burnout among employees should include individuals seeking psychological and medical help. Burnout impacts both professional and personal quality of life. Consequently, preventive measures addressing burnout are increasingly seen as a domain of organizational improvement, while interventions and treatments for mental health issues remain the domain of medical professionals.

Piśmiennictwo

1. Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Sanz-Vergel A. Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annu Revi Organ Psych 2023;10(1):25-53

2. Demerouti E, Bakker AB. Job demands-resources theory in times of crises: New propositions. Organ Psych Rev 2023;13(3)209-36

3. World Health Organization. Burn-out an "occupational phenomenon": International Classification of Diseases. 28 May 2019. https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2019-burn-out-an-occupational-phenomenon-international-classification-of-diseases

4. Maslach C, Jackson SE. The measurement of experienced burnout. J Organ Behav 1981;2(2):99-113

5. Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job burnout. Annu Rev Psychol 2001;52(1):397-422

6. Schaufeli W, De Witte H. Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT). A fresh look at burnout. In: International Handbook of Behavioral Health Assessment. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023:1-24

7. Chen C, Meier ST. Burnout and depression in nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2021;124:104099

8. Koutsimani P, Montgomery A, Georganta K. The relationship between burnout, depression, and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychol 2019;10:284

9. Meier ST, Kim S. Meta-regression analyses of relationships between burnout and depression with sampling and measurement methodological moderators. J Occup Health Psychol 2022;27(2):195

10. Li CJ, Shah YB, Harness ED, et al. Physician burnout and medical errors: exploring the relationship, cost, and solutions. Am J Med Qual 2023;38(4):196-202

11. Owoc J, Mańczak M, Jabłońska M, et al. Association between physician burnout and self-reported errors: meta-analysis. J Patient Saf 2022;18(1):e180-8

12. Panagioti M, Geraghty K, Johnson J, et al. Association between physician burnout and patient safety, professionalism, and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2018;178(10):1317-31

13. Pasikowski T. Polska adaptacja kwestionariusza Maslach Burnout Inventory. W: Sęk H (red.). Wypalenie zawodowe. Przyczyny, mechanizmy, zapobieganie. Warszawa: PWN, 2012:135-48

14. Maslach C, Leiter M. Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. J Appl Psychol 2008;93(3):498-512

15. Chirkowska-Smolak T, Kleka P. The Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey: Validation across different occupational groups in Poland. Pol Psychol Bull 2011;42(2):86-94

16. Leiter MP, Maslach C. Pandemic implications for six areas of worklife. In: Burnout While Working. Routledge, 2022:21-37

17. De Beer LT, van der Vaart L, Escaffi-Schwarz M, et al. Maslach Burnout Inventory – General Survey: A systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties. Eur J Psychol Assess 2024;40(5):360-75

18. Bianchi R, Swingler G, Schonfeld IS. Burnout: Fifty Years Later. Workplace Health Saf 2024;72(8):354

19. Bianchi R, Schonfeld IS. Burnout: half a century of controversy. Occup Med 2024;74(6):400-2

20. Cordes CL, Dougherty TW. A review and an integration of research on job burnout. Acad Manage Rev 1993;18(4):621-56

21. Deligkaris P, Panagopoulou E, Montgomery AJ, et al. Job burnout and cognitive functioning: A systematic review. Work Stress 2014;28(2):107-23

22. Gavelin HM, Domellöf ME, Åström E, et al. Cognitive function in clinical burnout: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Work Stress 2022;36(1):86-104

23. Basinska BA, Dåderman AM. Psychometric properties of the Bern illegitimate tasks scale using classical test and item response theories. Sci Rep-UK 2023;13(1):7211

24. Baka Ł, Basińska BA. Psychometryczne właściwości polskiej wersji oldenburskiego kwestionariusza wypalenia zawodowego (OLBI). Med Pr 2016;67(1):29-41

25. Basinska BA, Gruszczynska E, Schaufeli WB. The Polish adaptation of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT-PL) by Schaufeli et al. Psychiatr Pol 2023;57(1):223-35

26. Guseva-Canu I, Marca SC, Dell’Oro F, et al. Harmonized definition of occupational burnout: A systematic review, semantic analysis, and Delphi consensus in 29 countries. Scand J Work Environ Health 2021;47(2):95-107

27. Schaufeli WB, De Witte H, Hakanen JJ, et al. How to assess severe burnout? Cutoff points for the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) based on three European samples. Scan J Work Environ Health 2023;49(4):293-3027

28. De Beer LT, Schaufeli WB, De Witte H, et al. Measurement invariance of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) across seven cross-national representative samples. Int J Env Res Pub He 2020;17(15):5604

29. De Beer LT, Schaufeli WB, De Witte H. The psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT-23) in South Africa. BMC Pub Health 2022;22(1):1555

30. Sakakibara K, Shimazu A, Toyama H, et al. Validation of the Japanese version of the burnout assessment tool. Front Psychol 2020;11:1819

31. Sinval J, Vazquez ACS, Hutz CS, et al. Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT): Validity Evidence from Brazil and Portugal. Int J Env Res Pub He 2022;19(3):1344

32. Lesener T, Gusy B, Wolter Ch. The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Work Stress 2019;33:1:76-103

33. Basinska BA, Gruszczynska E. Burnout as a State: Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Relationship Between Exhaustion and Disengagement in a 10-Day Study. Psychol Res Behav Manag 2020:13:267-78

34. Zhu H, Yang X, Xie S, et al. Prevalence of burnout and mental health problems among medical staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2023;13(7):e061945

35. Macaron MM, Segun-Omosehin OA, Matar RH, et al. A systematic review and meta analysis on burnout in physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic: A hidden healthcare crisis. Front Psychiatry 2023;13:1071397

36. Bianchi R, Schonfeld IS. The occupational depression inventory: A new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J Psychosom Res 2020;138:110249

37. Oosterholt BG, Maes JH, Van der Linden D, et al. Burnout and cortisol: evidence for a lower cortisol awakening response in both clinical and non-clinical burnout. J Psychosom Res 2015;78(5):445-51

38. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Hoogduin K, et al. On the clinical validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory and the burnout measure. Psychol Health 2001;16(5):565-82

39. Bianchi R, Schonfeld IS, Sowden JF, et al. Measurement invariance of the occupational depression inventory: A study of 12,589 participants across 14 countries. Work & Stress 2023. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/02678373.2024.2364594?needAccess=true

40. Basinska BA, Wiciak I, Dåderman AM. Fatigue and burnout in police officers: the mediating role of emotions. Policing 2014;37(3):665-80

41. Clark LA, Watson D. Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. J Abnorm Psychol 1991;100(3):316-36

42. Mangory KY, Ali LY, Rø KI, et al. Effect of burnout among physicians on observed adverse patient outcomes: a literature review. BMC Health Serv Res 2021;21(1):1-8

43. Tawfik DS, Scheid A, Profit J, et al. Evidence relating health care provider burnout and quality of care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2019;171(8):555-67

44. World Health Organization. Zarządzanie ryzykiem psychospołecznym – ramowe podejście europejskie. Wskazania dla pracodawców i reprezentantów pracowników (seria: Protecting workers’ health, 9). Warszawa: CIOP-BIP, 2008

45. Khammissa RA, Nemutandani S, Feller G, et al. Burnout phenomenon: neurophysiological factors, clinical features, and aspects of management. J Int Med Res 2022;50(9):03000605221106428

46. De Hert S. Burnout in Healthcare Workers: Prevalence, Impact and Preventative Strategies. Local Reg Anesth 2020;13:171-83

47. Korczak D, Wastian M, Schneider M. Therapy of the burnout syndrome. GMS Health Technol Assess 2012;8(Jun14):Doc05

48. Fernández-Arata M, Calderón-De la Cruz GA, Dominguez-Lara S. Reduction of Burnout Syndrome in Health Workers through a Cognitive-Behavioural Model-Based Program: A Pilot Study. Psychological Topics 2022;31(3):585-603

49. Orosz A, Federspiel A, Eckert A, et al. Exploring the effectiveness of a specialized therapy programme for burnout using subjective report and biomarkers of stress. Clin Psychol Psychot 2021;28(4):852-61

50. Grensman A, Acharya BD, Wändell P, et al. Effect of traditional yoga, mindfulness–based cognitive therapy, and cognitive behavioral therapy, on health related quality of life: a randomized controlled trial on patients on sick leave because of burnout. BMC Complem Altern M 2018;18(1):1-16

Do góry